chris
09-25 03:08 PM
Again i heard one more new word from IO today " File is in Adjudications Area ".
Any idea what is that mean ?
Any idea what is that mean ?
wallpaper Justin Bieber picked up an
smartin
04-30 06:02 PM
Hi all,
I had my h1 issued in nov '09 and was laid off from the company in march '10. However, I was able to secure other position in the same company a month later. But now the company wants me to exit/re-enter the country (and get my visa stamped) before starting the new position.
Since I was technically out of status for the month of April (and don't have any paystubs for the same), will it be difficult to get my h1 visa stamped? Also, can I get my stamping done in Canada, or will I have to my home country?
Thanks in advance..
S. M
I had my h1 issued in nov '09 and was laid off from the company in march '10. However, I was able to secure other position in the same company a month later. But now the company wants me to exit/re-enter the country (and get my visa stamped) before starting the new position.
Since I was technically out of status for the month of April (and don't have any paystubs for the same), will it be difficult to get my h1 visa stamped? Also, can I get my stamping done in Canada, or will I have to my home country?
Thanks in advance..
S. M
DallasBlue
07-20 09:46 PM
Hi,
I am Vijay Vellabati, finished MS in Dec-06 and I got a job in Jul.
I am in my OPT(Optional Practical training). I did not get to file for my H1-B.
Can my company apply for Green card for me right now.
Because I need to keep my status, my OPT expires in Dec-07.
If anyone can get back to me, I would appreciate that.
Thank you.
Vijay Vellabati
My email id: vellabati@yahoo.com
Yes, green card is for future employment, your employer can apply for your greencard!!
But usually the greencard process takes so long that it is nearly impossible to get it in a year (the time you have in OPT) so the safe bet is to apply h1b otherwise in US-Masters quota if you have one. And take it from there.
--disclaimer am not a lawyer , seek a professional lawyers opinion.
I am Vijay Vellabati, finished MS in Dec-06 and I got a job in Jul.
I am in my OPT(Optional Practical training). I did not get to file for my H1-B.
Can my company apply for Green card for me right now.
Because I need to keep my status, my OPT expires in Dec-07.
If anyone can get back to me, I would appreciate that.
Thank you.
Vijay Vellabati
My email id: vellabati@yahoo.com
Yes, green card is for future employment, your employer can apply for your greencard!!
But usually the greencard process takes so long that it is nearly impossible to get it in a year (the time you have in OPT) so the safe bet is to apply h1b otherwise in US-Masters quota if you have one. And take it from there.
--disclaimer am not a lawyer , seek a professional lawyers opinion.
2011 selena gomez and justin bieber
GKBest
10-11 02:01 PM
I-485A is the Section 245 (i) right?
more...
roseball
10-30 11:17 AM
Hello,
If one gets stuck with H1b revalidation, and then gets approved after 6 months. Is there any issues when coming back to the US at the POE entry?
Please let me know.
S
No issues, but make sure you have a updated employment verification letter from your employer saying that you still have a job. I have seen some cases with my friends where the immigration officer asked for a letter when they were outside the country for more than 3 months....One of my friends did not have a letter and the officer called his employer and verified that he still has a job before letting him in....So I would just carry a letter to be on the safe side rather than going through the hassle.....
If one gets stuck with H1b revalidation, and then gets approved after 6 months. Is there any issues when coming back to the US at the POE entry?
Please let me know.
S
No issues, but make sure you have a updated employment verification letter from your employer saying that you still have a job. I have seen some cases with my friends where the immigration officer asked for a letter when they were outside the country for more than 3 months....One of my friends did not have a letter and the officer called his employer and verified that he still has a job before letting him in....So I would just carry a letter to be on the safe side rather than going through the hassle.....
pkuttu
01-07 07:51 PM
Hi,
I need some advice on what are my options.
I have been working with a consulting company since June 2006. I have an approved Perm and approved 140 with the same company.
Before my Perm and 140 were approved we got my H1-b extended till September 2011.
I am planning to visit my home country and need to attend for Visa stamping. I have booked my tickets too.
The problem is my company has recently changed its location and I have the old address on my paperwork (I-797, LCA etc)
But the latest pay stubs have the new Address.
Will I have any problems when I attend for Visa stamping?
Do we need to apply for the ammendment? In that case should I postpone my trip, get the paperwork and then go for stamping?
Thanks and Regards
I need some advice on what are my options.
I have been working with a consulting company since June 2006. I have an approved Perm and approved 140 with the same company.
Before my Perm and 140 were approved we got my H1-b extended till September 2011.
I am planning to visit my home country and need to attend for Visa stamping. I have booked my tickets too.
The problem is my company has recently changed its location and I have the old address on my paperwork (I-797, LCA etc)
But the latest pay stubs have the new Address.
Will I have any problems when I attend for Visa stamping?
Do we need to apply for the ammendment? In that case should I postpone my trip, get the paperwork and then go for stamping?
Thanks and Regards
more...
Macaca
07-23 07:32 PM
Reid's Anti-Reform Maneuvers (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/22/AR2007072200881.html?nav=hcmodule) By Robert D. Novak (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/robert+d.+novak/) Washington Post, July 23, 2007
When Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid picked up his ball and went home after his staged all-night session last week, he saved from possible embarrassment one of the least regular members of his Democratic caucus: Sen. Ben Nelson of Nebraska. Reform Republican Tom Coburn had ready an amendment to the defense authorization bill removing Nelson's earmark funding a Nebraska-based company whose officials include Nelson's son. Such an effort became impossible when Reid pulled the bill.
That Reid's action had this effect was mere coincidence. He knew that Sen. Carl Levin's amendment to the defense bill mandating a troop withdrawal from Iraq would fall short of the 60 votes needed to cut off debate, and Reid planned from the start to pull the bill after the all-night session, designed to satisfy antiwar zealots, was completed. But Reid is also working behind the scenes with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to undermine earmark transparency and prevent open debate on spending proposals such as Nelson's.
These antics fit the continuing decline of the Senate, including an unwritten rules change requiring 60 votes to pass any meaningful bill. When I arrived on Capitol Hill 50 years ago, Majority Leader Lyndon Johnson (like Reid today) had a slim Democratic majority and faced a Republican president, but he was not burdened with the 60-vote rule. While Johnson did use chicanery, Reid resorts to brute force that shatters the Senate's facade of civilized discourse. Reid is plotting to strip anti-earmark transparency from the final version of ethics legislation passed by the Senate and House, with tacit support from Republican senators and the GOP leadership.
At stake is the fate of Coburn's "Reid amendment," previously passed by the Senate and so called because it would bar earmarks benefiting a senator's family members such as Reid's four lobbyist sons and son-in-law. Nelson's current $7.5 million earmark for software helps 21st Century Systems Inc. (21CSI), which employs the senator's son, Patrick Nelson, as its marketing director. The company gets 80 percent of its funds from federal grants, mostly through earmarks. With nine offices scattered among states represented by appropriators in Congress, the company has in recent years spent $1.1 million to lobby Congress and $160,000 in congressional campaign contributions. "As of April," the Omaha World-Herald reported, "only one piece of [the company's] software has been used -- to help guard a single Marine camp in Iraq -- and it was no longer in use."
In requesting the 21CSI earmark, Nelson did not disclose his son's employment. "There's no requirement that he disclose that," a Nelson spokesman told this column. "But frankly, in this case, we didn't disclose it because it's so public." An April 24 letter from Levin giving senators instructions on how to request an earmark made no mention of the "Reid amendment" that had been passed by the Senate three months earlier but that required only certification that no senator's spouse would benefit from an earmark. Inclusion of Nelson's son, however, would be required if the ethics bill provision passes.
When the defense authorization bill came up last week, Coburn prepared amendments to eliminate the Nelson earmark and the most notorious earmark pending in Congress: Democratic Rep. John Murtha's proposed $23 million for the National Drug Intelligence Center in his Pennsylvania district. Reid's plan to satisfy antiwar activists with an all-night debate averted debate, for now, on those two earmarks.
Reid, the soft-spoken trial lawyer from Searchlight, Nev., has tended to suppress free expression in the World's Greatest Deliberative Body in his tumultuous 6 1/2 months as majority leader. Last week, he cut off an attempt by Sen. Arlen Specter, the veteran moderate Republican, to respond to him with an abruptness that I had not witnessed in a half-century of Senate watching. When Specter finally got the floor, he declared: "Nothing is done here until the majority leader decides to exercise his power to keep the Senate in all night on a meaningless, insulting session. . . . Last night's performance made us the laughingstock of the world." It may get worse if plans to eviscerate ethics legislation are pursued.
When Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid picked up his ball and went home after his staged all-night session last week, he saved from possible embarrassment one of the least regular members of his Democratic caucus: Sen. Ben Nelson of Nebraska. Reform Republican Tom Coburn had ready an amendment to the defense authorization bill removing Nelson's earmark funding a Nebraska-based company whose officials include Nelson's son. Such an effort became impossible when Reid pulled the bill.
That Reid's action had this effect was mere coincidence. He knew that Sen. Carl Levin's amendment to the defense bill mandating a troop withdrawal from Iraq would fall short of the 60 votes needed to cut off debate, and Reid planned from the start to pull the bill after the all-night session, designed to satisfy antiwar zealots, was completed. But Reid is also working behind the scenes with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to undermine earmark transparency and prevent open debate on spending proposals such as Nelson's.
These antics fit the continuing decline of the Senate, including an unwritten rules change requiring 60 votes to pass any meaningful bill. When I arrived on Capitol Hill 50 years ago, Majority Leader Lyndon Johnson (like Reid today) had a slim Democratic majority and faced a Republican president, but he was not burdened with the 60-vote rule. While Johnson did use chicanery, Reid resorts to brute force that shatters the Senate's facade of civilized discourse. Reid is plotting to strip anti-earmark transparency from the final version of ethics legislation passed by the Senate and House, with tacit support from Republican senators and the GOP leadership.
At stake is the fate of Coburn's "Reid amendment," previously passed by the Senate and so called because it would bar earmarks benefiting a senator's family members such as Reid's four lobbyist sons and son-in-law. Nelson's current $7.5 million earmark for software helps 21st Century Systems Inc. (21CSI), which employs the senator's son, Patrick Nelson, as its marketing director. The company gets 80 percent of its funds from federal grants, mostly through earmarks. With nine offices scattered among states represented by appropriators in Congress, the company has in recent years spent $1.1 million to lobby Congress and $160,000 in congressional campaign contributions. "As of April," the Omaha World-Herald reported, "only one piece of [the company's] software has been used -- to help guard a single Marine camp in Iraq -- and it was no longer in use."
In requesting the 21CSI earmark, Nelson did not disclose his son's employment. "There's no requirement that he disclose that," a Nelson spokesman told this column. "But frankly, in this case, we didn't disclose it because it's so public." An April 24 letter from Levin giving senators instructions on how to request an earmark made no mention of the "Reid amendment" that had been passed by the Senate three months earlier but that required only certification that no senator's spouse would benefit from an earmark. Inclusion of Nelson's son, however, would be required if the ethics bill provision passes.
When the defense authorization bill came up last week, Coburn prepared amendments to eliminate the Nelson earmark and the most notorious earmark pending in Congress: Democratic Rep. John Murtha's proposed $23 million for the National Drug Intelligence Center in his Pennsylvania district. Reid's plan to satisfy antiwar activists with an all-night debate averted debate, for now, on those two earmarks.
Reid, the soft-spoken trial lawyer from Searchlight, Nev., has tended to suppress free expression in the World's Greatest Deliberative Body in his tumultuous 6 1/2 months as majority leader. Last week, he cut off an attempt by Sen. Arlen Specter, the veteran moderate Republican, to respond to him with an abruptness that I had not witnessed in a half-century of Senate watching. When Specter finally got the floor, he declared: "Nothing is done here until the majority leader decides to exercise his power to keep the Senate in all night on a meaningless, insulting session. . . . Last night's performance made us the laughingstock of the world." It may get worse if plans to eviscerate ethics legislation are pursued.
2010 2011 Billboard Music Awards
techbuyer77
06-17 08:04 PM
oh I see.... well lets wait for the best
more...
walking_dude
08-15 05:49 PM
Created a poll here.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=12435
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=12435
hair hot Justin Bieber and Selena
beautifulMind
12-12 05:51 PM
The flower campiagn works the best lets send flowers to white house and this time in thousands..letters faxes are not read but flowers cannot be avoided
more...
yuvarajc
09-14 08:31 AM
Thank you for the link.
hot tattoo Justin Bieber and
raysaikat
06-22 12:29 AM
Hi All,
My wife is on H1 since Oct 2009. No paystubs. Now she want to come back on H4. Her H4 stamping expired. I have my H1 renewed in Oct 2009 and need stamping.
What are the best and low risk options to convert to H4 status. Please advice
Thanks
When did her latest I-94 expire?
She most likely is out-of-status for a long time (more than 6 months). Also she started/would start accruing illegal/unlawful presence from the day her I-94 expired/expires. Talk to a lawyer before doing anything.
My wife is on H1 since Oct 2009. No paystubs. Now she want to come back on H4. Her H4 stamping expired. I have my H1 renewed in Oct 2009 and need stamping.
What are the best and low risk options to convert to H4 status. Please advice
Thanks
When did her latest I-94 expire?
She most likely is out-of-status for a long time (more than 6 months). Also she started/would start accruing illegal/unlawful presence from the day her I-94 expired/expires. Talk to a lawyer before doing anything.
more...
house 2011 Justin Bieber and Selena
prinive
04-07 04:08 PM
Finally got our GC... PD : Sep 11 2001 EB3 India.... a looooooooooooonggggggggggggggg wait. Thanks IV... for the support...
tattoo Picture Of Justin Bieber And
Pari8
01-24 07:05 AM
I was working for company A in US till June 2008. I had to return to India in July 2008 due to personal reasons. My 6th yr on H1b expired in October 2008.
I am now in India and applying for 3yrs H1b extension based on my approved I140 with company B. My I485 was filed in august 2007. I do not have US pay stubs since July 2008 as I did not work in US.
Has anybody been in a similar situation? What are the chances of getting approval? Once I get I797 approval, should I expect further challenges in getting visa stamped in India?
thanks
-Pari
I am now in India and applying for 3yrs H1b extension based on my approved I140 with company B. My I485 was filed in august 2007. I do not have US pay stubs since July 2008 as I did not work in US.
Has anybody been in a similar situation? What are the chances of getting approval? Once I get I797 approval, should I expect further challenges in getting visa stamped in India?
thanks
-Pari
more...
pictures After the BMA#39;s, Justin was
Blog Feeds
08-31 09:50 PM
The LA Times reports on the Nevada governor's race which has Latino Brian Sandoval seeking to become the next Republican governor of the state. Sandoval has risked alienating his Latino base by endorsing the Arizona law and tougher drivers license rules. The GOP is hoping that Latino voters will vote for someone who looks like them even if he or she supports policies that are the polar opposite of what they believe. I doubt very much that will happen. Voters vote their interests first and then may look at a person's ethnicity if two candidates are similar in their views....
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/08/the-definition-of-lonely.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/08/the-definition-of-lonely.html)
dresses selena gomez billboard cover
iamraj1984
12-09 11:26 AM
Hi,
I am currently on H1b and had recently filed papers for transfer from employer A to employer B. I have got the email from USCIS that my case has been approved and that documents will be delivered soon.
My H1b transfer has been accepted for 01/01/2010. My date of joining the new job is 01/04/2010. My original H1b with company A is still valid till Oct 2009.
Since I have to give my old employer a two weeks notice to resign. If I give my notice around 12/21/2009 (notice period of leaving by 01/04/2010) and my employer relieves (terminates) me immediately will I be out of status at any time?
Also, My green card process is going to start soon. Is it going to affect me as I am worried that I might be out of visa status from 12/21/2009 to 01/01/2010.
Please suggest. I need to make a decision in few day.
Would greatly appreciate a response.
Thanks,
I am currently on H1b and had recently filed papers for transfer from employer A to employer B. I have got the email from USCIS that my case has been approved and that documents will be delivered soon.
My H1b transfer has been accepted for 01/01/2010. My date of joining the new job is 01/04/2010. My original H1b with company A is still valid till Oct 2009.
Since I have to give my old employer a two weeks notice to resign. If I give my notice around 12/21/2009 (notice period of leaving by 01/04/2010) and my employer relieves (terminates) me immediately will I be out of status at any time?
Also, My green card process is going to start soon. Is it going to affect me as I am worried that I might be out of visa status from 12/21/2009 to 01/01/2010.
Please suggest. I need to make a decision in few day.
Would greatly appreciate a response.
Thanks,
more...
makeup Justin Bieber and Selena Gomez
Janisaris
08-24 10:10 AM
I am a July 19th filer and I have not received my receipts. I checked with my lawyer yesterday and they have not received either. Since my lawyer issued all the checks I have no idea whether my checks are cleared or not. So here is my question. How long will it take for the actual reciept after the check clearance.
PD: 17th May 2004
I140: 5the June 2005
I485 : Filed on 19th July
PD: 17th May 2004
I140: 5the June 2005
I485 : Filed on 19th July
girlfriend Justin Bieber and Selena Gomez
paskal
07-21 11:24 AM
akhil,
you and your wife are most welcome to join
thanks!
you and your wife are most welcome to join
thanks!
hairstyles images Justin Bieber and
precious123
03-22 06:20 PM
Dear Attorney,
Below are my details:
Current work status : H1B
Applied for I-485 , July'07 filer, priority date: jun EB3 category
My husband details:
Current work status : H1B
Applied for I-485 , July'07 filer, priority date: Feb EB3 category
We both have separate EADs and H1B visas and are independent of each other currently.
Because my priority date is 2006 and my husband's is in 2005, there is more possibility that he may get GC before my PD becomes current.
When my husband's priority date becomes current, he wants to file it for me again so i would get GC along with him.
I am now considering to look out for jobs and use my EAD card with new employer.
Can I make my EAD active ? Will it cause any problems when my husband's priority date becomes current and when we file my application along with his ?
Any input is greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
Below are my details:
Current work status : H1B
Applied for I-485 , July'07 filer, priority date: jun EB3 category
My husband details:
Current work status : H1B
Applied for I-485 , July'07 filer, priority date: Feb EB3 category
We both have separate EADs and H1B visas and are independent of each other currently.
Because my priority date is 2006 and my husband's is in 2005, there is more possibility that he may get GC before my PD becomes current.
When my husband's priority date becomes current, he wants to file it for me again so i would get GC along with him.
I am now considering to look out for jobs and use my EAD card with new employer.
Can I make my EAD active ? Will it cause any problems when my husband's priority date becomes current and when we file my application along with his ?
Any input is greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
InTheMoment
04-22 04:10 PM
https://egov.uscis.gov/crisgwi/go?action=coa
cooldudesfo
12-22 12:18 AM
Hi,
Need quick suggestion:
Company A filed for GC. Labor and I-140 was approved. I-485 was filed during July 2007.
I changed employer in June 2009; replied to RFE and filed AC21 in July 2009.
I came to know that my GC sponsring company is going to close the company soon. My current immigration attorney is suggesting that if that happens; and if INS came to know that GC sponsring company is closing down, they will revoke my I-140.
Is it true? I thought after AC21 is invoked; whatever happens to GC sponsring company, it will not impact my GC application in any way.
Please advice.
V
Need quick suggestion:
Company A filed for GC. Labor and I-140 was approved. I-485 was filed during July 2007.
I changed employer in June 2009; replied to RFE and filed AC21 in July 2009.
I came to know that my GC sponsring company is going to close the company soon. My current immigration attorney is suggesting that if that happens; and if INS came to know that GC sponsring company is closing down, they will revoke my I-140.
Is it true? I thought after AC21 is invoked; whatever happens to GC sponsring company, it will not impact my GC application in any way.
Please advice.
V
No comments:
Post a Comment